[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+QA0tRk2VVJ4gwu@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 20:06:42 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/6] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 09:46:25AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 2/3/23 17:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:28:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
[...]
> > This looks like it should be fixed. I'd also like to see Mark's ack on the
>
> This build warning is triggered when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not enabled, when
> all the fallback stubs in there try to use has_branch_stack() which does not
> get defined. The following change, fixes the problem.
I expect that you'll post a v9 with that folded in, and I've just made some
comments on v7 which I expect will require some changes, so I'm going to wait
for v9 for further review to keep this manageable.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists