linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 5/6] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fd66a78-6c18-3b61-483b-0e821082aaac@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 08:18:11 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/6] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU



On 2/9/23 01:36, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 09:46:25AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 2/3/23 17:01, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:28:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> This looks like it should be fixed. I'd also like to see Mark's ack on the
>>
>> This build warning is triggered when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not enabled, when
>> all the fallback stubs in there try to use has_branch_stack() which does not
>> get defined. The following change, fixes the problem.
> 
> I expect that you'll post a v9 with that folded in, and I've just made some
> comments on v7 which I expect will require some changes, so I'm going to wait
> for v9 for further review to keep this manageable.

Sure, will work on a V9 and post when ready.