[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACWXhK=Jk+FsJ50mc2KFkFYMb9P1BXGv1D4dR=_M1gymqREpiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 14:39:57 +0800
From: Feiyang Chen <chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, arnd@...db.de,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/nolibc: Add support for LoongArch
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 12:34, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:54:07AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:09:42AM +0800, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com wrote:
> > > From: Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>
> > >
> > > Add support for LoongArch (64 bit) to nolibc selftest.
> >
> > Please also mention in this one that the makefile was reindented with
> > no other change than adding entries for loongarch, this will save
> > those reading this patch later from checking that the rest was not
> > changed.
>
> I like Willy's suggestion, but even better would be to put the whitespace
> changes into one commit, and the code changes into another commit.
> This makes it a lot easier for reviewers and future nolibc developers
> to quickly and easily see exactly what changed.
>
Hi, Willy, Paul,
I get it now, thank you.
> And one of those future nolibc maintainers just might be you! ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
Thanks,
Feiyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists