[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+NHA9kOw0eFlUQp@sol.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 22:53:55 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: block: sleeping in atomic warnings
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:35:54PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Now, it's possible that "the kernel automatically adds the key for
> test_dummy_encryption" could be implemented a bit differently. It maybe could
> be done at the last minute, when the key is being looked for due to a user
> filesystem operation, instead of during the mount itself. That would eliminate
> the need to call fscrypt_destroy_keyring() from __put_super(), which would avoid
> the issue being discussed here. I'll see if there's a good way to do that.
"[PATCH 0/5] Add the test_dummy_encryption key on-demand"
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20230208062107.199831-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u)
implements this.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists