[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+NvCts0JPBmAifu@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:44:42 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/4] mm: move PG_slab flag to page_type
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:04:01PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.01.23 06:11, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:34:59PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > > > Seems like quite some changes to page_type to accomodate SLAB, which is
> > > > hopefully going away soon(TM). Could we perhaps avoid that?
> > >
> > > If it could be done with less changes, I'll try to avoid that.
> >
> > Let me outline the idea I had for removing PG_slab:
> >
> > Observe that PG_reserved and PG_slab are mutually exclusive. Also,
>
> I recall that there are SetPageReserved() calls on pages allocated via slab.
I did a quick scan, and it seems that all allocated reserved pages come
from alloc_pages() or vmalloc().
BTW, looking at the current usage of SetPageReserved, it seems that some
are bogus/historical and some would justify a different page type if we are
to have 15 bits for PG_kernel.
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists