[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebed9128-a56f-0493-0cc8-d13e1de077fc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:13:57 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/4] mm: move PG_slab flag to page_type
On 08.02.23 10:44, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:04:01PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 30.01.23 06:11, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:34:59PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>>>>> Seems like quite some changes to page_type to accomodate SLAB, which is
>>>>> hopefully going away soon(TM). Could we perhaps avoid that?
>>>>
>>>> If it could be done with less changes, I'll try to avoid that.
>>>
>>> Let me outline the idea I had for removing PG_slab:
>>>
>>> Observe that PG_reserved and PG_slab are mutually exclusive. Also,
>>
>> I recall that there are SetPageReserved() calls on pages allocated via slab.
>
> I did a quick scan, and it seems that all allocated reserved pages come
> from alloc_pages() or vmalloc().
>
Thanks for checking, good that my memory was wrong :)
> BTW, looking at the current usage of SetPageReserved, it seems that some
> are bogus/historical and some would justify a different page type if we are
> to have 15 bits for PG_kernel.
I remember raising in the past that something like PG_hole might be helpful.
I also recall that most SetPageReserved usage in drivers is to make
ioremap happy. PG_ioremappable or smth like that would be better.
So yes, that would even help to cleanup the existing PG_reserved usage.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists