linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:28:08 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...e.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, yue.li@...verge.com,
        Ravikumar.Bangoria@....com, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing

On 2/8/23 22:04, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> First, IIRC, Intel PEBS at the time only gave guest virtual addresses in
>> the PEBS records.  They had to be translated back to host addresses to
>> be usable.  That was extra expensive.
> Just to be clear, I am using IBS in host only and it can give both virtual
> and physical address.

Could you talk a little bit about how IBS might get used for NUMA
balancing guest memory?