linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powercap/intel_rapl: Fix handling for large time window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gtCffDTVi-SoQ0KanPiSZUS3gONX7a-ZHAXQRr97H-EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 18:06:44 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap/intel_rapl: Fix handling for large time window

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 2:25 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> When setting the power limit time window, software updates the 'y' bits
> and 'f' bits in the power limit register, and the value hardware takes
> follows the formula below
>
>         Time window = 2 ^ y * (1 + f / 4) * Time_Unit
>
> When handling large time window input from userspace, using left
> shifting breaks in two cases,
> 1. when ilog2(value) is bigger than 31, in expression "1 << y", left
>    shifting by more than 31 bits has undefined behavior. This breaks
>    'y'. For example, on an Alderlake platform, "1 << 32" returns 1.
> 2. when ilog2(value) equals 31, "1 << 31" returns negative value
>    because '1' is recognized as signed int. And this breaks 'f'.
>
> Given that 'y' has 5 bits and hardware can never take a value larger
> than 31, fix the first problem by clamp the time window to the maximum
> possible value that the hardware can take.
>
> Fix the second problem by using unsigned bit left shift.
>
> Note that hardware has its own maximum time window limitation, which
> may be lower than the time window value retrieved from the power limit
> register. When this happens, hardware clamps the input to its maximum
> time window limitation. That is why a software clamp is preferred to
> handle the problem on hand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> index 26d00b1853b4..8b30e5259d3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> @@ -999,7 +999,12 @@ static u64 rapl_compute_time_window_core(struct rapl_package *rp, u64 value,
>
>                 do_div(value, rp->time_unit);
>                 y = ilog2(value);
> -               f = div64_u64(4 * (value - (1 << y)), 1 << y);
> +               if (y > 0x1f) {
> +                       pr_warn("%s: time window too large, clamped\n", rp->name);

IIUC this happens when user space provides a value that is too large.
Why do you want to log a kernel warning in that case?

> +                       return 0x7f;

Because the target hardware field has 7 bits, the function will return
all ones if the exponent is too large.  It would be good to put a
comment stating this here.

> +               }
> +
> +               f = div64_u64(4 * (value - (1ULL << y)), 1ULL << y);
>                 value = (y & 0x1f) | ((f & 0x3) << 5);
>         }
>         return value;
> --