[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478c5730-f3c3-103a-fab2-829f1099c8b5@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:09:42 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: allow PM menu options for COMPILE_TEST
Hi Geert,
On 2/9/23 06:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:06 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> Allow PM options for COMPILE_TEST. This quietens a kconfig
>> warning.
>>
>> This is similar to a patch for Sparc32 that was suggested by
>> Arnd.
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PM
>> Depends on [n]: !MMU [=y]
>> Selected by [y]:
>> - SUN20I_PPU [=y] && (ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ menu "Kernel Features"
>>
>> endmenu
>>
>> -if !MMU
>> +if !MMU || COMPILE_TEST
>> menu "Power management options"
>
> I think this is the wrong solution.
> All other selects of PM are done by architecture/platform-gating
Yes, which is where they should be.
> symbols, and none of them can be enabled for compile-testing.
>
> So either SUN20I_PPU should depend on PM, or ARCH_SUNXI
> should select PM.
I'll do the first choice since I shouldn't be the one to make
a platform config change without knowing about the platform.
Thank you.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists