[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUrmKsi0arun17uVkAaoRe2vs1Xy_XY8Mb2dA6wu8q9iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 15:03:25 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: allow PM menu options for COMPILE_TEST
Hi Randy,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:06 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> Allow PM options for COMPILE_TEST. This quietens a kconfig
> warning.
>
> This is similar to a patch for Sparc32 that was suggested by
> Arnd.
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PM
> Depends on [n]: !MMU [=y]
> Selected by [y]:
> - SUN20I_PPU [=y] && (ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ menu "Kernel Features"
>
> endmenu
>
> -if !MMU
> +if !MMU || COMPILE_TEST
> menu "Power management options"
I think this is the wrong solution.
All other selects of PM are done by architecture/platform-gating
symbols, and none of them can be enabled for compile-testing.
So either SUN20I_PPU should depend on PM, or ARCH_SUNXI
should select PM.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists