[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <416afeb8-4385-6d8a-4b35-2c75ffaa36cc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 10:29:00 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, huyue2@...lpad.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] erofs: update print symbols for various flags in
trace
On 2023/2/8 19:29, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> As new flags introduced, the corresponding print symbols for trace are
> not added accordingly. Add these missing print symbols for these flags.
>
> Also remove the print symbol for EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW as it is going to
> be removed soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v2: remove print symbol for EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW
> ---
> include/trace/events/erofs.h | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/erofs.h b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
> index e095d36db939..cf4a0d28b178 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/erofs.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
> @@ -19,12 +19,17 @@ struct erofs_map_blocks;
> { 1, "DIR" })
>
> #define show_map_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
> - { EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW, "RAW" })
Should we remove this in the next patch?
Otherwise it looks good to me.
Thanks,
Gao XIang
> + { EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_FIEMAP, "FIEMAP" }, \
> + { EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_READMORE, "READMORE" }, \
> + { EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_FINDTAIL, "FINDTAIL" })
>
> #define show_mflags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "", \
> - { EROFS_MAP_MAPPED, "M" }, \
> - { EROFS_MAP_META, "I" }, \
> - { EROFS_MAP_ENCODED, "E" })
> + { EROFS_MAP_MAPPED, "M" }, \
> + { EROFS_MAP_META, "I" }, \
> + { EROFS_MAP_ENCODED, "E" }, \
> + { EROFS_MAP_FULL_MAPPED, "F" }, \
> + { EROFS_MAP_FRAGMENT, "R" }, \
> + { EROFS_MAP_PARTIAL_REF, "P" })
>
> TRACE_EVENT(erofs_lookup,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists