[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <400c57ca-2804-a660-e543-42e15ac3b4a4@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 10:30:45 +0800
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, huyue2@...lpad.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] erofs: update print symbols for various flags in
trace
On 2/9/23 10:29 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/2/8 19:29, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>> As new flags introduced, the corresponding print symbols for trace are
>> not added accordingly. Add these missing print symbols for these flags.
>>
>> Also remove the print symbol for EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW as it is going to
>> be removed soon.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> v2: remove print symbol for EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW
>> ---
>> include/trace/events/erofs.h | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/erofs.h b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
>> index e095d36db939..cf4a0d28b178 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/erofs.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/erofs.h
>> @@ -19,12 +19,17 @@ struct erofs_map_blocks;
>> { 1, "DIR" })
>> #define show_map_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
>> - { EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW, "RAW" })
>
> Should we remove this in the next patch?
> Otherwise it looks good to me.
>
Okay I will update this in the next version.
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists