linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:37:19 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling

On Wed,  8 Feb 2023 23:13:55 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:

> Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported
> by codespell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was
>  then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis.
>  
>  Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer
> -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava
> +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have
>  priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time
>  kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.
>  

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve