linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/24] Documentation: x86: correct spelling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d5b5cf43-0dea-da68-1417-3d12e4a4bce8@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:19:22 -0800
From:   Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/24] Documentation: x86: correct spelling



On 2/8/23 23:13, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Correct spelling problems for Documentation/x86/ as reported
> by codespell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>   Documentation/x86/boot.rst    |    2 +-
>   Documentation/x86/buslock.rst |    2 +-
>   Documentation/x86/mds.rst     |    2 +-
>   Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst |    2 +-
>   Documentation/x86/sgx.rst     |    2 +-
>   5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ The kernel command line should not be lo
>   code, nor should it be located in high memory.
>   
>   
> -Sample Boot Configuartion
> +Sample Boot Configuration
>   =========================
>   
>   As a sample configuration, assume the following layout of the real
> diff -- a/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst b/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> --- a/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ mechanisms to detect split locks and bus
>   --------------------------------------
>   
>   Beginning with the Tremont Atom CPU split lock operations may raise an
> -Alignment Check (#AC) exception when a split lock operation is attemped.
> +Alignment Check (#AC) exception when a split lock operation is attempted.
>   
>   #DB exception for bus lock detection
>   ------------------------------------
> diff -- a/Documentation/x86/mds.rst b/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
> --- a/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/mds.rst
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ needed for exploiting MDS requires:
>      data
>   
>   The existence of such a construct in the kernel cannot be excluded with
> -100% certainty, but the complexity involved makes it extremly unlikely.
> +100% certainty, but the complexity involved makes it extremely unlikely.
>   
>   There is one exception, which is untrusted BPF. The functionality of
>   untrusted BPF is limited, but it needs to be thoroughly investigated
> diff -- a/Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst
> --- a/Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/resctrl.rst
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ this would be dependent on number of cor
>      depending on # of threads:
>   
>   For the same SKU in #1, a 'single thread, with 10% bandwidth' and '4
> -thread, with 10% bandwidth' can consume upto 10GBps and 40GBps although
> +thread, with 10% bandwidth' can consume up to 10GBps and 40GBps although
>   they have same percentage bandwidth of 10%. This is simply because as
>   threads start using more cores in an rdtgroup, the actual bandwidth may
>   increase or vary although user specified bandwidth percentage is same.
> diff -- a/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst b/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> --- a/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/sgx.rst
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ SGX will likely become unusable because
>   limited. However, while this may be fatal to SGX, the rest of the kernel
>   is unlikely to be impacted and should continue to work.
>   
> -As a result, when this happpens, user should stop running any new
> +As a result, when this happens, the user should stop running any new
>   SGX workloads, (or just any new workloads), and migrate all valuable
>   workloads. Although a machine reboot can recover all EPC memory, the bug
>   should be reported to Linux developers.

Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>

Thanks.

-Fenghua