[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+XG4mWPi4X9/hHZ@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:24:02 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness
grouping
On (23/02/07 10:47), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > enum fullness_group {
> > > - ZS_EMPTY,
> > > - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY,
> > > - ZS_ALMOST_FULL,
> > > - ZS_FULL,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_0,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_10,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_20,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_30,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_40,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_50,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_60,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_70,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_80,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_90,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_99,
> > > + ZS_USAGE_100,
> > > NR_ZS_FULLNESS,
> > > };
> > >
> >
> > Is there a reason why this can't be done with something like #define
> > FULLNESS_GROUPS 10? We can make sure during build that (100 %
> > FULLNESS_GROUPS == 0) to make our lives easier. I feel like the code
> > will be much more concise and easier to navigate, instead of multiple
> > enums and static arrays.
>
> I wanted to keep things the way they are to make reviews simpler.
> We probably can do something more "disruptive" in a separate patch.
Forgot to mention, I was also thinking about extending zsmalloc stats
file and providing values for each fullness group per class, as opposed
to current ALMOST_EMPTY and ALMOST_FULL stats, which don't tell much.
I can get rid of static const arrays and pass "begin / end" group IDs to
functions that iterate fullness lists and pick the first head page, but
I think that enum values will stay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists