[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5945f254-0581-093b-168d-8cf2c0a34eab@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:35:53 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, tglx@...utronix.de, kevin.tian@...el.com,
darwi@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix build error when CONFIG_PCI_MSI
disabled
if, new function going to part of #else case . that is absolutely fine.
but that is not present in given PATCH.
Thanks,
Alok
On 2/11/2023 2:42 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Alok,
>
> On 2/10/2023 12:45 PM, ALOK TIWARI wrote:
>> shall we need to define this function under -> #ifndef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>>
>> +static inline struct msi_map
>> +pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int index,
>> + const struct irq_affinity_desc *affdesc)
>> +{
>> + struct msi_map map = { .index = -ENOSYS };
>> +
>> + return map;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void pci_msix_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct msi_map map)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
> No need. include/linux/pci.h already has those definitions.
>
> include/linux/pci.h already has:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>
> ...
>
> #else
>
> ...
> /* new function definitions will be inserted here */
> ...
>
> #endif
>
>
> Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists