[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpo3HbuxeJjdWimwHwKwTsPnzKvm20yQE-8no4A3AqcmHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 14:58:40 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: display: msm: dp-controller: document
SM8450 compatible
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 13:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2023 16:27, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > On 10/02/2023 16:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >>> The SM8450 & SM350 shares the same DT TX IP version, use the
> >>> SM8350 compatible as fallback for SM8450.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 25 +++++++++++++---------
> >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> >>> index 0e8d8df686dc..f0c2237d5f82 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> >>> @@ -15,16 +15,21 @@ description: |
> >>> properties:
> >>> compatible:
> >>> - enum:
> >>> - - qcom,sc7180-dp
> >>> - - qcom,sc7280-dp
> >>> - - qcom,sc7280-edp
> >>> - - qcom,sc8180x-dp
> >>> - - qcom,sc8180x-edp
> >>> - - qcom,sc8280xp-dp
> >>> - - qcom,sc8280xp-edp
> >>> - - qcom,sdm845-dp
> >>> - - qcom,sm8350-dp
> >>> + oneOf:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - qcom,sc7180-dp
> >>> + - qcom,sc7280-dp
> >>> + - qcom,sc7280-edp
> >>> + - qcom,sc8180x-dp
> >>> + - qcom,sc8180x-edp
> >>> + - qcom,sc8280xp-dp
> >>> + - qcom,sc8280xp-edp
> >>> + - qcom,sdm845-dp
> >>> + - qcom,sm8350-dp
> >>> + - items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - qcom,sm8450-dp
> >>> + - const: qcom,sm8350-dp
> >>
> >> Neil, Krzysztof, I'm not convinced that this is worth all the troubles. I think it would be easier to have a flat list of compatibles and handle all the differences inside the driver. For example, for sdm845 we simply reused sc7180 config internally, while keeping separate compatible strings.
> >
> > Sure, but the doc reports the SM8350, SM8450 and SM550 has the exact same IP version, isn't fallback for that cat ?
>
> Exactly.
>
> What's the trouble with the list Neil created?
No troubles. I felt that it fell out of the line, but no other issues.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists