linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] net: ethernet: mtk_eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Feb 2023 12:56:47 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jianhui Zhao <zhaojh329@...il.com>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: switch to external
 PCS driver

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:40:22PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> +		eth->sgmii->dev = eth->dev;
>  		err = mtk_sgmii_init(eth->sgmii, pdev->dev.of_node,
>  				     eth->soc->ana_rgc3);

>From what I can tell, it looks like sgmii->dev is only used within
mtk_sgmii_init() and nowhere else, so does it make sense to store
this in the structure rather than passing it as another argument to
this function? Seems a little wasteful for something that is only
used there.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-mtk-lynxi.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-mtk-lynxi.c
> index 67965a6b57a4..f10621fc5baa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-mtk-lynxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-mtk-lynxi.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ static int mtk_pcs_lynxi_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
>  		bmcr = 0;
>  
>  	if (mpcs->interface != interface) {
> +		link_timer = phylink_get_link_timer_ns(interface);
> +		if (link_timer < 0)
> +			return link_timer;
> +
>  		/* PHYA power down */
>  		regmap_update_bits(mpcs->regmap, SGMSYS_QPHY_PWR_STATE_CTRL,
>  				   SGMII_PHYA_PWD, SGMII_PHYA_PWD);
> @@ -168,11 +172,7 @@ static int mtk_pcs_lynxi_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
>  		regmap_update_bits(mpcs->regmap, mpcs->ana_rgc3,
>  				   RG_PHY_SPEED_MASK, rgc3);
>  
> -		/* Setup the link timer and QPHY power up inside SGMIISYS */
> -		link_timer = phylink_get_link_timer_ns(interface);
> -		if (link_timer < 0)
> -			return link_timer;
> -
> +		/* Setup the link timer */
>  		regmap_write(mpcs->regmap, SGMSYS_PCS_LINK_TIMER, link_timer / 2 / 8);
>  
>  		mpcs->interface = interface;

I'm guessing you meant to squash that into patch 10 rather than this
patch?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!