linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: frequency: adf4377: remove duplicate/repeating constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f9d31ad-db91-a6b9-3a70-cfc983cd99b7@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:57:51 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>,
        Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: frequency: adf4377: remove duplicate/repeating
 constant

Le 11/02/2023 à 08:07, Deepak R Varma a écrit :
> Constant ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_R_MSK is unnecessarily or'ed with
> itself. Remove the redundant constant from the expression.
> Issue identified using doublebitand.cocci Coccinelle semantic patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c
> index 26abecbd51e0..caefd7ea6b14 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c
> @@ -495,8 +495,8 @@ static int adf4377_soft_reset(struct adf4377_state *st)
>   		return ret;
>   
>   	return regmap_read_poll_timeout(st->regmap, 0x0, read_val,
> -					!(read_val & (ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_R_MSK |
> -					ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_R_MSK)), 200, 200 * 100);
> +					!(read_val & ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_R_MSK),
> +					200, 200 * 100);

Based on the code just above, it is likely that one is expected to be 
ADF4377_0000_SOFT_RESET_MSK.

CJ

>   }
>   
>   static int adf4377_get_freq(struct adf4377_state *st, u64 *freq)