[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467c0abe-251f-d74b-57c8-91e02bec1c05@kernel.dk>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:46:14 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API Mailing List <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Samba Technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>
Subject: Re: copy on write for splice() from file to pipe?
On 2/11/23 11:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 7:33 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> OK, but then the ignore_sig change should not be needed at all, just
>> changing that first bit to fatal_signal_pending() would do the trick?
>
> Right. That was my point. The 'ignore_sig' flag just doesn't make
> sense. It was a hack for a case that shouldn't exist.
Yep, just wanted to confirm that we'd _only_ do that first one and
not go to sleep later on ignoring a signal as that could lead to
issues. Your fatal signal pending suggestion is all we need.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists