[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a334087-9c72-2d86-e1d6-5d08ed5adc45@kontron.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:23:33 +0100
From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Frieder Schrempf <frieder@...s.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Per-Daniel Olsson <perdo@...s.com>,
Rickard x Andersson <rickaran@...s.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Revert "regulator: pca9450: Add SD_VSEL GPIO for
LDO5"
On 13.02.23 17:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/13/23 16:58, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>>
>> This reverts commit 8c67a11bae889f51fe5054364c3c789dfae3ad73.
>>
>> It turns out that all boards using the PCA9450 actually have the
>> SD_VSEL input conencted to the VSELECT signal of the SoCs SD/MMC
>
> 'connected' , typo .
Thanks!
> btw would it make sense to squash 3..5 patches into a single patch ?
Hm, don't know. I think the changes are easier to understand with the
current separation between "revert", "core changes" and "pca9450 changes".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists