[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae011239-5eab-29dc-4b90-87182b0d3a1b@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:10:08 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder@...s.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Per-Daniel Olsson <perdo@...s.com>,
Rickard x Andersson <rickaran@...s.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Revert "regulator: pca9450: Add SD_VSEL GPIO for
LDO5"
On 2/13/23 17:23, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 13.02.23 17:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 2/13/23 16:58, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 8c67a11bae889f51fe5054364c3c789dfae3ad73.
>>>
>>> It turns out that all boards using the PCA9450 actually have the
>>> SD_VSEL input conencted to the VSELECT signal of the SoCs SD/MMC
>>
>> 'connected' , typo .
>
> Thanks!
>
>> btw would it make sense to squash 3..5 patches into a single patch ?
>
> Hm, don't know. I think the changes are easier to understand with the
> current separation between "revert", "core changes" and "pca9450 changes".
OK, I don't mind either way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists