| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230213184334.00007111@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:43:34 +0200
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/28] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:29:07 +0000
Steven Price <steven.price@....com> wrote:
> The wrappers make the call sites easier to read and deal with the
> boiler plate of handling the error codes from the RMM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h | 259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d5468ee46f35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_RMI_CMDS_H
> +#define __ASM_RMI_CMDS_H
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
> +
> +struct rtt_entry {
> + unsigned long walk_level;
> + unsigned long desc;
> + int state;
> + bool ripas;
> +};
> +
It would be nice to have some information of the follwoing wrappers. E.g.
meaning of the return value. They will be quite helpful in the later patch
review.
> +static inline int rmi_data_create(unsigned long data, unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr, unsigned long src,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_DATA_CREATE, data, rd, map_addr, src,
> + flags, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_data_create_unknown(unsigned long data,
> + unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_DATA_CREATE_UNKNOWN, data, rd, map_addr,
> + &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_data_destroy(unsigned long rd, unsigned long map_addr)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_DATA_DESTROY, rd, map_addr, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_features(unsigned long index, unsigned long *out)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_FEATURES, index, &res);
> +
> + *out = res.a1;
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_granule_delegate(unsigned long phys)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_GRANULE_DELEGATE, phys, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_granule_undelegate(unsigned long phys)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_GRANULE_UNDELEGATE, phys, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_psci_complete(unsigned long calling_rec,
> + unsigned long target_rec)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_PSCI_COMPLETE, calling_rec, target_rec,
> + &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_realm_activate(unsigned long rd)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REALM_ACTIVATE, rd, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_realm_create(unsigned long rd, unsigned long params_ptr)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REALM_CREATE, rd, params_ptr, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_realm_destroy(unsigned long rd)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REALM_DESTROY, rd, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rec_aux_count(unsigned long rd, unsigned long *aux_count)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REC_AUX_COUNT, rd, &res);
> +
> + *aux_count = res.a1;
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rec_create(unsigned long rec, unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long params_ptr)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REC_CREATE, rec, rd, params_ptr, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rec_destroy(unsigned long rec)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REC_DESTROY, rec, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rec_enter(unsigned long rec, unsigned long run_ptr)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_REC_ENTER, rec, run_ptr, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_create(unsigned long rtt, unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr, unsigned long level)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_CREATE, rtt, rd, map_addr, level,
> + &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_destroy(unsigned long rtt, unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr, unsigned long level)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_DESTROY, rtt, rd, map_addr, level,
> + &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_fold(unsigned long rtt, unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr, unsigned long level)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_FOLD, rtt, rd, map_addr, level, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_init_ripas(unsigned long rd, unsigned long map_addr,
> + unsigned long level)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_INIT_RIPAS, rd, map_addr, level, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_map_unprotected(unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr,
> + unsigned long level,
> + unsigned long desc)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_MAP_UNPROTECTED, rd, map_addr, level,
> + desc, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_read_entry(unsigned long rd, unsigned long map_addr,
> + unsigned long level, struct rtt_entry *rtt)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs = {
> + SMC_RMI_RTT_READ_ENTRY,
> + rd, map_addr, level
> + };
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_2_smc(®s, ®s);
> +
> + rtt->walk_level = regs.a1;
> + rtt->state = regs.a2 & 0xFF;
> + rtt->desc = regs.a3;
> + rtt->ripas = regs.a4 & 1;
> +
> + return regs.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_set_ripas(unsigned long rd, unsigned long rec,
> + unsigned long map_addr, unsigned long level,
> + unsigned long ripas)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS, rd, rec, map_addr, level,
> + ripas, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rmi_rtt_unmap_unprotected(unsigned long rd,
> + unsigned long map_addr,
> + unsigned long level)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_RTT_UNMAP_UNPROTECTED, rd, map_addr,
> + level, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline phys_addr_t rmi_rtt_get_phys(struct rtt_entry *rtt)
> +{
> + return rtt->desc & GENMASK(47, 12);
> +}
> +
> +#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists