[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230213184701.00005d3b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:47:01 +0200
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/28] arm64: RME: Keep a spare page delegated to
the RMM
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:29:12 +0000
Steven Price <steven.price@....com> wrote:
> Pages can only be populated/destroyed on the RMM at the 4KB granule,
> this requires creating the full depth of RTTs. However if the pages are
> going to be combined into a 4MB huge page the last RTT is only
> temporarily needed. Similarly when freeing memory the huge page must be
> temporarily split requiring temporary usage of the full depth oF RTTs.
>
> To avoid needing to perform a temporary allocation and delegation of a
> page for this purpose we keep a spare delegated page around. In
> particular this avoids the need for memory allocation while destroying
> the realm guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> index 055a22accc08..a6318af3ed11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ struct realm {
> void *rd;
> struct realm_params *params;
>
> + /* A spare already delegated page */
> + phys_addr_t spare_page;
> +
> unsigned long num_aux;
> unsigned int vmid;
> unsigned int ia_bits;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> index 9f8c5a91b8fc..0c9d70e4d9e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static int realm_create_rd(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
>
> realm->rd = rd;
> + realm->spare_page = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> realm->ia_bits = VTCR_EL2_IPA(kvm->arch.vtcr);
>
> if (WARN_ON(rmi_rec_aux_count(rd_phys, &realm->num_aux))) {
> @@ -357,6 +358,11 @@ void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> free_page((unsigned long)realm->rd);
> realm->rd = NULL;
> }
> + if (realm->spare_page != PHYS_ADDR_MAX) {
> + if (!WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(realm->spare_page)))
> + free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(realm->spare_page));
Will the page be leaked (not usable for host and realms) if the undelegate
failed? If yes, better at least put a comment.
> + realm->spare_page = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> + }
>
> pgd_sz = kvm_pgd_pages(pgt->ia_bits, pgt->start_level);
> for (i = 0; i < pgd_sz; i++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists