[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAH4kHYrz2pZzwAqoy-mpA_om1+tO8qB-4ZHc9jKh_ucwZe3OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:28:13 -0800
From: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <Borislav.Petkov@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Michael Sterritt <sterritt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/3] virt/coco/sev-guest: Add throttling awareness
>
> This should really be a new, separate patch.
>
I had it as a separate patch and squashed since I felt it necessary to
be considered still a "Fixes" patch. Should both claim to fix the same
patch?
>
> It looks like you will ensure throttling by continually calling the
> hypervisor for 60 seconds, shouldn't there be a delay here?
>
I can change cond_resched() to sleep_timeout_killable(some_constant)
> > - rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + goto retry;
> >
> > + }
>
> Nit, add a blank line here.
>
Will do.
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
--
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists