lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83382901-6d0b-b38f-27cd-3a45259eee85@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:44:48 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michał Mirosław 
        <emmir@...gle.com>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/6] mm/pagemap: add documentation of PAGEMAP_SCAN
 IOCTL

On 2/10/23 12:26 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:29:14PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Add some explanation and method to use write-protection and written-to
>> on memory range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
>> index 6e2e416af783..1cb2189e9a0d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/pagemap.rst
>> @@ -230,3 +230,27 @@ Before Linux 3.11 pagemap bits 55-60 were used for "page-shift" (which is
>>  always 12 at most architectures). Since Linux 3.11 their meaning changes
>>  after first clear of soft-dirty bits. Since Linux 4.2 they are used for
>>  flags unconditionally.
>> +
>> +Pagemap Scan IOCTL
>> +==================
>> +
>> +The ``PAGEMAP_SCAN`` IOCTL on the pagemap file can be used to get and/or clear
>> +the info about page table entries. The following operations are supported in
>> +this IOCTL:
>> +- Get the information if the pages have been written-to (``PAGE_IS_WRITTEN``),
>> +  file mapped (``PAGE_IS_FILE``), present (``PAGE_IS_PRESENT``) or swapped
>> +  (``PAGE_IS_SWAPPED``).
>> +- Write-protect the pages (``PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE``) to start finding which
>> +  pages have been written-to.
>> +- Find pages which have been written-to and write protect the pages
>> +  (atomic ``PAGE_IS_WRITTEN + PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE``)
> 
> Could we extend this section a bit more?  Some points for reference:
> 
>   - The new struct you introduced, definitions of each of the fields, and
>     generic use cases for each of the field/ops.
> 
>   - It'll be nice to list the OPs the new interface supports (GET,
>     WP_ENGAGE, GET+WP_ENGAGE).
> 
>   - When should people use this rather than the old pagemap interface?
>     What's the major problems to solve / what's the major difference?
>     (Maybe nice to reference the Windows API too here)
I'll update the documentation.

> 
>> +
>> +To get information about which pages have been written-to and/or write protect
>> +the pages, following must be performed first in order:
>> + 1. The userfaultfd file descriptor is created with ``userfaultfd`` syscall.
>> + 2. The ``UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC`` feature is set by ``UFFDIO_API`` IOCTL.
>> + 3. The memory range is registered with ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP`` mode
>> +    through ``UFFDIO_REGISTER`` IOCTL.
>> +Then the any part of the registered memory or the whole memory region can be
>> +write protected using the ``UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT`` IOCTL or ``PAGEMAP_SCAN``
>> +IOCTL.
> 
> This part looks good.
> 
> Thanks,
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ