linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: vf610: make irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf0u_F4bFs-1hyckG7h-7r3XqxdZc_6EjuWxTxbfMPMjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:45:45 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: vf610: make irq_chip immutable

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:59 PM Alexander Stein
<alexander.stein@...tq-group.com> wrote:
>
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
>
>     "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
>
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.

Thanks for an update, something to amend below, otherwise
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
> ---
> Thanks Andy for the feedback!
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Add missing calls to gpiochip_disable_irq() and gpiochip_enable_irq()
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> index a429176673e7..b657a07a9b56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct fsl_gpio_soc_data {
>
>  struct vf610_gpio_port {
>         struct gpio_chip gc;
> -       struct irq_chip ic;
>         void __iomem *base;
>         void __iomem *gpio_base;
>         const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data *sdata;
> @@ -207,19 +206,23 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
>
>  static void vf610_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
> -       struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
> -               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +       struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>         void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);

Now you can use gpio_num here...

> +       irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
>
>         vf610_gpio_writel(0, pcr_base);
> +       gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
>  }
>
>  static void vf610_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
> -       struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
> -               gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
> +       struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +       struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>         void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);
> +       irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
>
> +       gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
>         vf610_gpio_writel(port->irqc[d->hwirq] << PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET,

...and here.


>                           pcr_base);
>  }
> @@ -237,6 +240,17 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static const struct irq_chip vf610_irqchip = {
> +       .name = "gpio-vf610",
> +       .irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack,
> +       .irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask,
> +       .irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask,
> +       .irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type,
> +       .irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake,
> +       .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> +       GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> +};
> +
>  static void vf610_gpio_disable_clk(void *data)
>  {
>         clk_disable_unprepare(data);
> @@ -249,7 +263,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         struct vf610_gpio_port *port;
>         struct gpio_chip *gc;
>         struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
> -       struct irq_chip *ic;
>         int i;
>         int ret;
>
> @@ -315,14 +328,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         gc->direction_output = vf610_gpio_direction_output;
>         gc->set = vf610_gpio_set;
>
> -       ic = &port->ic;
> -       ic->name = "gpio-vf610";
> -       ic->irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack;
> -       ic->irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask;
> -       ic->irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask;
> -       ic->irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type;
> -       ic->irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake;
> -
>         /* Mask all GPIO interrupts */
>         for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++)
>                 vf610_gpio_writel(0, port->base + PORT_PCR(i));
> @@ -331,7 +336,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         vf610_gpio_writel(~0, port->base + PORT_ISFR);
>
>         girq = &gc->irq;
> -       girq->chip = ic;
> +       gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
>         girq->parent_handler = vf610_gpio_irq_handler;
>         girq->num_parents = 1;
>         girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1,
> --
> 2.34.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko