[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230214125949.3462396-1-alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:59:49 +0100
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: vf610: make irq_chip immutable
Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
"not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
---
Thanks Andy for the feedback!
Changes in v2:
* Add missing calls to gpiochip_disable_irq() and gpiochip_enable_irq()
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
index a429176673e7..b657a07a9b56 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct fsl_gpio_soc_data {
struct vf610_gpio_port {
struct gpio_chip gc;
- struct irq_chip ic;
void __iomem *base;
void __iomem *gpio_base;
const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data *sdata;
@@ -207,19 +206,23 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
static void vf610_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
- gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);
+ irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
vf610_gpio_writel(0, pcr_base);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
}
static void vf610_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct vf610_gpio_port *port =
- gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d));
+ struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
void __iomem *pcr_base = port->base + PORT_PCR(d->hwirq);
+ irq_hw_number_t gpio_num = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, gpio_num);
vf610_gpio_writel(port->irqc[d->hwirq] << PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET,
pcr_base);
}
@@ -237,6 +240,17 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
return 0;
}
+static const struct irq_chip vf610_irqchip = {
+ .name = "gpio-vf610",
+ .irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack,
+ .irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type,
+ .irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+ GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
+};
+
static void vf610_gpio_disable_clk(void *data)
{
clk_disable_unprepare(data);
@@ -249,7 +263,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct vf610_gpio_port *port;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
- struct irq_chip *ic;
int i;
int ret;
@@ -315,14 +328,6 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gc->direction_output = vf610_gpio_direction_output;
gc->set = vf610_gpio_set;
- ic = &port->ic;
- ic->name = "gpio-vf610";
- ic->irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack;
- ic->irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask;
- ic->irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask;
- ic->irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type;
- ic->irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake;
-
/* Mask all GPIO interrupts */
for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++)
vf610_gpio_writel(0, port->base + PORT_PCR(i));
@@ -331,7 +336,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
vf610_gpio_writel(~0, port->base + PORT_ISFR);
girq = &gc->irq;
- girq->chip = ic;
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
girq->parent_handler = vf610_gpio_irq_handler;
girq->num_parents = 1;
girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists