[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6792ea0-d210-a31d-b7da-8525e1315505@csail.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:09:58 -0800
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc: bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, paulmck@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imammedo@...hat.com,
amakhalov@...are.com, ganb@...are.com, ankitja@...are.com,
bordoloih@...are.com, keerthanak@...are.com, blamoreaux@...are.com,
namit@...are.com, wyes.karny@....com, lewis.carroll@....com,
pv-drivers@...are.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hotplug: Remove incorrect comment about
mwait_play_dead()
Hi,
On 1/27/23 4:37 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
>
> The comment that says mwait_play_dead() returns only on failure is a
> bit misleading because mwait_play_dead() could actually return for
> valid reasons (such as mwait not being supported by the platform) that
> do not indicate a failure of the CPU offline operation. So, remove the
> comment.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Gentle ping for review. Thank you!
Regards,
Srivatsa
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 55cad72715d9..9013bb28255a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@ void native_play_dead(void)
> play_dead_common();
> tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
>
> - mwait_play_dead(); /* Only returns on failure */
> + mwait_play_dead();
> if (cpuidle_play_dead())
> hlt_play_dead();
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists