linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/134] 5.10.168-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+veuKPmuGpXjnDS@sashalap>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:19:20 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/134] 5.10.168-rc2 review

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On 2/14/23 09:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.168 release.
>>There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>let me know.
>>
>>Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:25:19 +0000.
>>Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
>Still observed for ppc:ppc32_allmodconfig:
>
>In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:16:
>arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h:131:8: error: redefinition of 'struct codegen_context'
>  131 | struct codegen_context {
>      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h:13,
>                 from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:16:
>arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:124:8: note: originally defined here
>  124 | struct codegen_context {
>      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:18:20: error: redefinition of 'bpf_flush_icache'
>   18 | static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
>      |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h:13,
>                 from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:16:
>arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h:139:20: note: previous definition of 'bpf_flush_icache' with type 'void(void *, void *)'
>  139 | static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
>      |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, sorry, I've dropped two broken patches.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha