[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+v/Yu/ELfzx954s@spud>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:38:42 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>, vineetg@...osinc.com,
heiko@...ech.de, slewis@...osinc.com,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Move struct riscv_cpuinfo to new header
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:50PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> In preparation for tracking and exposing microarchitectural details to
> userspace (like whether or not unaligned accesses are fast), move the
> riscv_cpuinfo struct out to its own new cpufeatures.h header. It will
> need to be used by more than just cpu.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
Really? I don't recall seeing this patch in v1? ;)
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..66c251d98290
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2022 Rivos, Inc
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
> +#define _ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
> +
> +/*
> + * These are probed via a device_initcall(), via either the SBI or directly
> + * from the cooresponding CSRs.
May as well fix the typo here while we are moving the code & a respin is
required anyway.
I'm sure we'll need this patch regardless of approach, so:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists