linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Move struct riscv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALs-Hss083BHj=bXv_nOqHXB8FNJEc4SSLW8ETqAh2+AmL0ocg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:57:13 -0800
From:   Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>, vineetg@...osinc.com,
        heiko@...ech.de, slewis@...osinc.com,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Move struct riscv_cpuinfo to new header

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 1:38 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:50PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> > In preparation for tracking and exposing microarchitectural details to
> > userspace (like whether or not unaligned accesses are fast), move the
> > riscv_cpuinfo struct out to its own new cpufeatures.h header. It will
> > need to be used by more than just cpu.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
>
> Really? I don't recall seeing this patch in v1? ;)

My bad, that's an artifact of the tool I'm using (patman) to help me
with patch formatting.

>
> >
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c             |  8 ++------
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..66c251d98290
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2022 Rivos, Inc
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
> > +#define _ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * These are probed via a device_initcall(), via either the SBI or directly
> > + * from the cooresponding CSRs.
>
> May as well fix the typo here while we are moving the code & a respin is
> required anyway.

Will do.

>
> I'm sure we'll need this patch regardless of approach, so:
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Thank you!