linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/21] KVM: x86: Add macros to track first...last VMX feature MSRs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:48:46 +0800
From:   Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/21] KVM: x86: Add macros to track first...last VMX
 feature MSRs

On 10/2/2023 8:31 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +/*
> + * The first...last VMX feature MSRs that are emulated by KVM.  This may or may
> + * not cover all known VMX MSRs, as KVM doesn't emulate an MSR until there's an
> + * associated feature that KVM supports for nested virtualization.
> + */
> +#define KVM_FIRST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR	MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC
> +#define KVM_LAST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR	MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC

Off-topic, we now have "#define MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS3 0x00000492",
any further changes needed here if L2 guest needs IPI virtualization or why not ?