linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/139] 5.10.168-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+tq8HvE2TjffLk9@debian>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:05:20 +0000
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/139] 5.10.168-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:49:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.168 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on qemu. New warning. [1]

[    0.768162] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pnp0/00:05/cmos_nvram0'
[    0.768167] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.168-rc1 #1
[    0.768168] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
[    0.768170] Call Trace:
[    0.768184]  dump_stack+0x72/0x92
[    0.768187]  sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x2a
[    0.768191]  sysfs_create_dir_ns+0xbc/0xd0
[    0.768194]  kobject_add_internal+0xb4/0x300
[    0.768195]  kobject_add+0x81/0xb0
[    0.768198]  ? klist_children_get+0x1a/0x30
[    0.768200]  device_add+0xdc/0x820
[    0.768203]  ? acpi_fwnode_property_present+0x5a/0x70
[    0.768206]  nvmem_register+0x4d6/0x7e0
[    0.768208]  devm_nvmem_register+0x3f/0x80
[    0.768211]  rtc_nvmem_register+0x38/0xe0
[    0.768213]  cmos_do_probe+0x56b/0x610
[    0.768215]  ? cmos_set_alarm_callback+0xd0/0xd0
[    0.768216]  ? rtc_handler+0xe0/0xe0
[    0.768218]  cmos_pnp_probe+0x74/0xa0
[    0.768220]  pnp_device_probe+0xc2/0x170
[    0.768222]  ? cmos_do_probe+0x610/0x610
[    0.768223]  really_probe+0x28a/0x470
[    0.768225]  driver_probe_device+0xec/0x160
[    0.768227]  device_driver_attach+0xb3/0xc0
[    0.768229]  ? device_driver_attach+0xc0/0xc0
[    0.768230]  __driver_attach+0xae/0x160
[    0.768232]  ? device_driver_attach+0xc0/0xc0
[    0.768234]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xc0
[    0.768235]  driver_attach+0x1e/0x30
[    0.768237]  bus_add_driver+0x148/0x210
[    0.768239]  driver_register+0x8f/0xf0
[    0.768241]  ? rtc_dev_init+0x39/0x39
[    0.768243]  pnp_register_driver+0x20/0x30
[    0.768244]  cmos_init+0x16/0x7d
[    0.768245]  ? rtc_dev_init+0x39/0x39
[    0.768249]  do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x1e0
[    0.768251]  kernel_init_freeable+0x22a/0x281
[    0.768254]  ? rest_init+0xbe/0xbe
[    0.768255]  kernel_init+0xe/0x112
[    0.768257]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[    0.768259] kobject_add_internal failed for cmos_nvram0 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory.


arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

Regression:
x86_64: Boot failed on my test laptop with a panic. Will try a bisect later today.


[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2856
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2857


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip