[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b64bd722-5ce7-9cca-9547-be84d0ef381a@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:05:05 +0000
From: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: at91: use devm_kasprintf() to avoid
potential leaks (part 2)
On 13.02.2023 17:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Use devm_kasprintf() instead of kasprintf() to avoid any potential
> leaks. At the moment drivers have no remove functionality hence
> there is no need for fixes tag.
>
> While at it, switch to use devm_kasprintf_strarray().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index 2e7debb905d5..5c01765c7a2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
>
> /* Since we request GPIOs from ourself */
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> @@ -1371,6 +1372,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct at91_pinctrl *info;
> struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;
> int ret, i, j, k;
> @@ -1394,9 +1396,19 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> for (i = 0, k = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
> + char **names;
> +
> + names = devm_kasprintf_strarray(dev, "pio", MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK);
> + if (!names)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> for (j = 0; j < MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK; j++, k++) {
> + char *name = names[j];
> +
> + strreplace(name, '-', i + 'A');
> +
> pdesc->number = k;
> - pdesc->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pio%c%d", i + 'A', j);
> + pdesc->name = name;
> pdesc++;
> }
> }
> @@ -1797,7 +1809,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] = {
>
> static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip = NULL;
> struct gpio_chip *chip;
> struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
> @@ -1866,16 +1879,14 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> chip->ngpio = ngpio;
> }
>
> - names = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, chip->ngpio, sizeof(char *),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> + names = devm_kasprintf_strarray(dev, "pio", chip->ngpio);
> if (!names) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto clk_enable_err;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++)
> - names[i] = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "pio%c%d", alias_idx + 'A', i);
> + strreplace(names[i], '-', alias_idx + 'A');
>
> chip->names = (const char *const *)names;
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists