linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] arm64: dts: apple: t8103: Add PWM controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMT+MTQLOZUids4N8Eba5SYOShPGJWqMSaCyF=cmh2KvBE3CaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:19:10 +0100
From:   Sasha Finkelstein <fnkl.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, marcan@...can.st,
        sven@...npeter.dev, alyssa@...enzweig.io, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] arm64: dts: apple: t8103: Add PWM controller

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 19:04, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> I'm not the one who will apply this patch, so I cannot say. Having said
> that, I wonder who will apply. Will this go via the arm tree, or via
> pwm?

That is a good question: The pwm driver should probably go via the
pwm tree, but the device tree changes would be better via asahi-soc.
That leaves the bindings as the, "no idea which one".
I wouldn't mind hearing from marcan or Krzysztof as to what their
thoughts are on how to send it properly.