[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+0w45eacPb8mgvh@monkey>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:22:11 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
sj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, david@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
willy@...radead.org, damon@...ts.linux.dev,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: hugetlb: change to return bool for
isolate_hugetlb()
On 02/15/23 18:39, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Now the isolate_hugetlb() only returns 0 or -EBUSY, and most users did not
> care about the negative value, thus we can convert the isolate_hugetlb()
> to return a boolean value to make code more clear when checking the
> hugetlb isolation state. Moreover converts 2 users which will consider
> the negative value returned by isolate_hugetlb().
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 +++---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
> mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
> mm/migrate.c | 7 +++----
> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists