[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2334035b-cc52-8dfb-9ba4-544081b98d6f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:19:42 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: sound: ep93xx: Add I2S and AC'97
descriptions
On 14/02/2023 15:26, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof!
>
> On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 15:11 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> + interrupts:
>>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> + clocks:
>>>>> + minItems: 3
>>>>
>>>> maxItems instead
>>>
>>> reg and clocks are required, I suppose I should include both minItems
>>> and maxItems for both of them?
>>
>> No. minItems is implied.
>
> I see. But I think minItems "3" should be included for clocks, right?
No, why? It is implied when you provide maxItems. Therefore why would
you need it to make it explicitly (although you can, but we avoid it for
smaller code)?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists