linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop mbox-names from example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230215192123.4ore7ac6tnedrsyq@ripper>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:21:23 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop
 mbox-names from example

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:15:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names
> property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. None.
> 2. Previously was sent as separate patch.
> 
> There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch
> (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be
> via different trees).

Jassi, I missed this note and merged the following patches, introducing
the forecasted issue in linux-next. To remedy this, I took the liberty
of merging this patch as well into the remoteproc tree.

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml       | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
> index 943f9472ae10..56b386b688b3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>          qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>;
>          mboxes = <&apcs_glb 0>;
> -        mbox-names = "rpm_hlos";
>      };
>  
>    # Example apcs with qcs404
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>