linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop mbox-names from example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABb+yY1xHOac4C7fWHW6Cj67-O7nBWFP8LXbW-9V_F24b1SMTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:46:17 -0600
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop
 mbox-names from example

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:15:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names
> > property.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. None.
> > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch.
> >
> > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch
> > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be
> > via different trees).
>
> Jassi, I missed this note and merged the following patches, introducing
> the forecasted issue in linux-next. To remedy this, I took the liberty
> of merging this patch as well into the remoteproc tree.
>
No problem.

Cheers.