[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ea12dd12-db17-44a8-8c29-6b0a129f355d@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:19:18 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Jessica Clarke" <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] kernel: Drop IA64 support from sig_fault handlers
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023, at 11:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/signal.h | 17 ++++---------
> kernel/signal.c | 25 ++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
The patch looks good, but I'd suggest adding a oneline description
referencing that ia64 as a whole is removed.
I see that you created a couple of patches looking for __ia64__
but not CONFIG_IA64. If we get consensus on patch 1, we should
do that as well, let me know if you you want to add those or
would like me to help here.
I can probably do the same recursive check for removed Kconfig
options that I used for finding dead code after the boardfile
removal.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists