[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80c60f09-56eb-cb84-43f0-7b055ea4b32c@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:50:23 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
ye.xingchen@....com.cn, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, james.lo@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 6/6] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add temperature
mitigation threshold
Il 14/02/23 15:43, Balsam CHIHI ha scritto:
> Hi Matthias, Angelo,
>
> Would you please confirm if this patch can be applied?
> and, if it is the case, to which tree it will be applied?
>
> Best regards,
> Balsam
I think it's fine to apply 5/6 and 6/6, as you're adding pre-Tjunction
max temperature - this is not board specific, but rather SoC-specific.
In reality it's practically the same for most SoCs, even.
Each board will define extensions (that are thermal envelope dependant)
to these "please-dont-burn-my-device" initial thresholds, but that's a
story for another day, and for other people anyway (including me).
Matthias, over to you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists