[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGuA+oqJVTXE5YHm6rSv4pPWsGxR8nZD-T5EM7LS9gPtdcu4HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:13:50 +0100
From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
ye.xingchen@....com.cn, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, james.lo@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 6/6] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add temperature
mitigation threshold
Hi Angelo,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:50 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 14/02/23 15:43, Balsam CHIHI ha scritto:
> > Hi Matthias, Angelo,
> >
> > Would you please confirm if this patch can be applied?
> > and, if it is the case, to which tree it will be applied?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Balsam
>
> I think it's fine to apply 5/6 and 6/6, as you're adding pre-Tjunction
> max temperature - this is not board specific, but rather SoC-specific.
> In reality it's practically the same for most SoCs, even.
>
> Each board will define extensions (that are thermal envelope dependant)
> to these "please-dont-burn-my-device" initial thresholds, but that's a
> story for another day, and for other people anyway (including me).
>
> Matthias, over to you!
Indeed.
Thank you for your feedback!
Best regards,
Balsam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists