[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+zrNiDsC0Mt7JAc@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:24:54 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzbot+a440341a59e3b7142895@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/12] splice: Fix O_DIRECT file read splice to avoid
reversion of ITER_PIPE
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:17:56PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Probably not, but I don't want to fiddle with that right now. I can send a
> follow up patch for it.
Honestly, I think this rush for 6.3 inclusion is a really bad idea.
This series fundamentally changes how splice reads work, and has only
been out for about a week. It hasn't even been Cc'ed to Al and Linus
which generally have a good knowledge of the splice code and an opinion
on it.
I think it is a good change, but I'd feel much more comfortable with
it for the next merge window rather than rushing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists