[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+0PzlA0LijhfD8R@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:01:02 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Remove the unused function within
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:47:44PM +0000, Chris Down wrote:
> Jiapeng Chong writes:
> > The function within is defined in the main.c file, but not called
> > elsewhere, so remove this unused function.
>
> Huh? It's used by __module_text_address(), no?
Not after commit 2ece476a2346 ("module: replace module_layout with
module_memory") in -next. This patch should have a fixes tag, even if
the warning is currently hidden behind W=1.
> > kernel/module/main.c:3007:19: warning: unused function 'within'.
> >
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
> > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/module/main.c | 5 -----
> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> > index c598f11e7016..062065568b40 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> > @@ -3004,11 +3004,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags)
> > return load_module(&info, uargs, flags);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int within(unsigned long addr, void *start, unsigned long size)
> > -{
> > - return ((void *)addr >= start && (void *)addr < start + size);
> > -}
> > -
> > /* Keep in sync with MODULE_FLAGS_BUF_SIZE !!! */
> > char *module_flags(struct module *mod, char *buf, bool show_state)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.20.1.7.g153144c
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists