[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9523a6ce-0220-e939-392d-2b48b2a4dc48@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:55:07 -0600
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Thomas Rijo-john <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
Lendacky Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication
On 2/16/2023 08:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:53AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 2/16/23 07:27, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>>> On 2/10/23 00:38, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
>>>> bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support"
>>>> - depends on X86_MSR
>>>> depends on ACPI
>>>> depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>>>> + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP && !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y &&
>>>> CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
>>>> help
>>>
>>> Would this look better if split? I.e.
>>>
>>> depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
>>> depends on !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
>> Yes, thanks I'll change that for next version.
>
> I'm wondering if this is homegrown implementation of 'imply' keyword?
>
Like this?
config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
depends on CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD
config CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD
imply I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists