[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+5EI3XGBzuwwVBV@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:56:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Thomas Rijo-john <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
Lendacky Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:53AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 2/16/23 07:27, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 2/10/23 00:38, Mario Limonciello wrote:
...
> > > config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
> > > bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support"
> > > - depends on X86_MSR
> > > depends on ACPI
> > > depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> > > + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP && !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y &&
> > > CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
> > > help
> >
> > Would this look better if split? I.e.
> >
> > depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
> > depends on !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
> Yes, thanks I'll change that for next version.
I'm wondering if this is homegrown implementation of 'imply' keyword?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists