linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:01:35 -0600
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
        Thomas Rijo-john <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
        Lendacky Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication

On 2/16/2023 14:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:55:07PM -0600, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>> On 2/16/2023 08:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:53AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> On 2/16/23 07:27, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>>>>> On 2/10/23 00:38, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>>>       config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
>>>>>>         bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support"
>>>>>> -    depends on X86_MSR
>>>>>>         depends on ACPI
>>>>>>         depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>>>>>> +    depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP && !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y &&
>>>>>> CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
>>>>>>         help
>>>>>
>>>>> Would this look better if split? I.e.
>>>>>
>>>>>       depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
>>>>>       depends on !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
>>>> Yes, thanks I'll change that for next version.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if this is homegrown implementation of 'imply' keyword?
>>>
>>
>> Like this?
>>
>> config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
>>     depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
>>     depends on CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD
>>
>> config CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD
>>     imply I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> 
> Looks okay, but I'm not familiar with this code. The documentation about
> 'imply' can be found here:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/kconfig-language.html#menu-attributes
> 
> 

Yeah I found that, but this was my first time using imply, so I was 
hoping someone who has used it could validate I interpreted it correctly.

Following the example CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD would be FOO and 
I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM would be BAZ so I thought so.