lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0baab14d-abea-4248-e6d5-23c465f0a4a5@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:07:25 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/rwsem: Wake up all readers for wait queue
 waker

On 2/13/23 22:09, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:48:32 -0500 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>>   
>> @@ -1281,7 +1282,7 @@ static struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
>>   
>>   	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
>> -		rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED, &wake_q);
>> +		rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED, &wake_q, false);
>>   
>>   	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
>>   	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
> Downgrade is conceptually the right time to let all read waiters go
> regardless write waiter.

Still, a downgraded task is still in the read critical section and we 
shouldn't introduce arbitrary latency to that. Let's focus on the easy 
one and we can discuss about other possibility later.

Thanks,
Longman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ