linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: atmel-mci: Convert to agnostic GPIO API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:36:59 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Balamanikandan Gunasundar 
        <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Chas Williams <3chas3@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: atmel-mci: Convert to agnostic GPIO API

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 16:53, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The of_gpio.h is going to be removed. In preparation of that convert
> > the driver to the agnostic API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> This is the third attempt to get this done, within this release cycle. :-)
> 
> Arnd's:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230126135034.3320638-1-arnd@kernel.org/
> 
> Balamanikandan's:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221226073908.17317-1-balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com/
> 
> Actually, Balamanikandan's version was acked already in December by
> Linus Walleij and Ludovic, but I failed to apply it so I was
> requesting a rebase.
> 
> That said, I think we should give BalaBalamanikandan some more time
> for a re-spin (unless someone is willing to help him out in this
> regard), as it's getting late for v6.3 anyway.

I see, thanks for heads up!

I believe there is still room for improvement in his series (I briefly looked
at it). Let's wait for v4 which I would like to review.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko